Get Addies Online Now

GAZA, IRAN AND THE UNITED KINGDOM OF REVERSE

Recent developments in the Middle East, involving two resolutions of the Security Council of the United Nations, must be analyzed from the perspective of U.S. interests .

Iran Sanctions for their reluctance to tame its nuclear program, and the rapid passage of the situation in Gaza (as a result of assault by Israeli commandos to ships carrying aid and volunteers to Strip ) reflect not only the undeniable weight of this power in the international system, but the contradictions of its own Barack Obama, who came to the government questioning the military strategic agenda of George Bush (h), but gradually seems to be assuming it as their own.

In this sense, economic and military blockade and a half million Palestinians living in Gaza, Hamas-controlled territory, can only be explained by the stubborn persistence of the Israeli right in holding the master plan for the reconfiguration of Asian geopolitics designed by former Vice President Dick Cheney and carried forward by the last Republican administration.

The same was semi-permanently occupy Iraq, replacing an unreliable ally Saddam Hussein as that issued by a puppet regime. The second step was to overthrow the Iranian theocratic dictatorship, launching bombing raids on strategic objectives that will undermine the morale of the armed forces Iranian and foster internal rebellion, intensified following the severe economic crisis and political repression and cultural, exacerbated during the administration of Mahmoud Ajmahdinejad. The hope was that discontent opposition push to the masses - that following the recent electoral fraud by the millions marched in the streets of Tehran - into the arms of the West.

The ultimate goal was to relocate under the direct orbit of the United States all the oil and gas in the region, and have military bases in the heart of Asia, to "throw stones" Russia and China. In this scheme falls website to the Gaza of Gaza, a move to sharpen the deep divisions at that time going through the various political factions representing the Palestinian people, deepen their infighting and allow the creation of a "pseudo" in the West Bank. It is recalled that since the assassination of Rabin - and the ensuing "death" of the peace negotiations and the Oslo agreements - the Israeli extreme right was able to become strategic agenda denial of the same resolution that established the UN United gave birth to the State of Israel: the creation of a Palestinian state on an equal footing.

support of sanctions against Iran by China and Russia - Iran's alleged protectors - reflect the typical game of big powers, and we remember the old axiom that in international politics States have no permanent allies, only permanent interests. However, the failed move made by the presidents of Brazil and Turkey, Lula Da Silva and Tayyip Erdogan, who established a real and effective channel for negotiations with Iranian officials on nuclear issue (apparently with the initial approval of contradictory Obama) , point to the possibility of an alternative path to the doctrine of "permanent war" that neoconservatives instituted during the first decade of this century as a working logic of the international system.

Both Lula and Erdogan are two emerging nations leaders in their respective spheres of influence, Latin America and Asia. Own personal prestige among the leaders and people of neighboring countries, but also good dialogue with the West. They have set a foreign policy agenda of peace, trade development with the defense of cultural pluralism political and religious. Claim an aggiornamento of the institutions of the international system to the new realities of the world that should be included in the game to Latin America, Africa and much of Asia, and make a more robust defense of international law.